r/postprocessing • u/Neither-Cut1328 • 8h ago
After / Before
Dolomites, Italy. I’m struggling to get this right and would appreciate some feedback. Would like to know how others might approach this edit.
Shot on Sony alpha and edited in Lightroom.
r/postprocessing • u/cameronrad • Aug 11 '16
So the last post I made (“How do I get this look?”) got buried pretty deep, so I thought I’d make this thread rounding up some videos/resources/techniques I’ve found.
I mentioned in the last thread that “post processing is more about theory than the tools/plugins/tricks/secrets/etc.” I may have misspoke a bit. I’m not saying neglect learning the tools, or stop searching for secrets, or stop using plugins; but rather use them in a more educational way. Knowing how all the tools work will help you apply them better and know when to apply them. Using plugins can be a great tool, but should never be a crutch. My feeling is anything a plugin can do, I want to know how to do for my own knowledge.
What if you’re an avid VSCO, Replichrome, Alien Skins, etc user and one day you’re working on a job with a fast turnaround time and your plugin fails, or it wasn’t on that computer, or it’s no longer compatible with Photoshop/Lightroom? What happens if your look was defined by a plugin, that you can’t recreate? Meanwhile you have a client waiting on their images. This is why having a vast knowledge of the tools/techniques is extremely valuable.
If you like a plugin, try reverse-engineering it. I’m not saying you have to use the reverse-engineered technique and stop using the plugin, but it sure helps when you know how the plugin is working. Heck you could even improve upon it ;)
Chasing “secrets” is also a great way to learn. It’s not necessarily that a “secret” exists but what you may learn along the way to “finding one”.
Anyways, what I’m saying is there’s no shame or problem with using plugin/preset/filters as tools in your kit; however like any tool you should have an understanding of how it works so you know when to use it, how to use it properly, or what to do if something goes wrong and you can’t use it. The better you get at editing, the more you may realize you need to improve as a photographer. You’ll come to a point where the quality of photo/editing has reached a cap due to the quality of the base image.
If anyone has any techniques/articles/tutorials that should be included, please comment or send me a message and I’ll add it in.
I’m not up to date on my tutorials. From what I’ve found Ben Secret and Michael Woloszynowicz have some of the most powerful techniques in their videos.
Like it or not, these are part of the landscape now. Worth knowing what's out there.
-Cameron Rad
How many people actually check out this thread? If you have gotten any help from it , shoot me a PM :)
r/postprocessing • u/Neither-Cut1328 • 8h ago
Dolomites, Italy. I’m struggling to get this right and would appreciate some feedback. Would like to know how others might approach this edit.
Shot on Sony alpha and edited in Lightroom.
r/postprocessing • u/miatookyourphoto • 18h ago
I took this photo in the Lake District last year while hiking. I’ve been quite ill this week, so I looked back at old photos to see if what I could edit in a completely different way. I also added in a moon just for “rule of cool” even though it is probably very unnatural or wrong hahaha
r/postprocessing • u/Any-Coach3440 • 1d ago
Maybe my favorite phone snap. I think my edit butchered the halation a bit, but what do you think otherwise? Also what is it about borders that make images more fun to look at?
r/postprocessing • u/Acrobatic_Task_4415 • 11h ago
Unrealistic or am I doubting myself..
r/postprocessing • u/UnParaguayito • 17h ago
Solar Halo in Paraguay
Was out today and noticed this solar halo, so I pulled out my iPhone and tried to capture it.
I’m pretty happy with how they turned out, but I’m still learning photography and would genuinely love some constructive criticism.
What do you think? Anything you would have done differently with the composition or editing?
r/postprocessing • u/YanksFannn • 1d ago
r/postprocessing • u/theclacks • 27m ago
Still new to post-processing. I wanted to capture both the pigeon and St. Paul's, but during editing realized the pigeon was my desired subject and cropped accordingly.
Mainly played with the tone curve, but to make the pigeon more visible, I applied a mask over the lower portion of the image and increased its exposure. I went back and forth with how much to brighten the cobblestones because brightening a) made the pigeon pop more but also b) reduced the contrast with the cathedral steps. In the end, I kept the brightening constrained. Still a grainier texture in that section though. Not fully satisfied with it still; but it's closer to my original intent.
Camera is RX100VII, taken in RAW, f/11, 1/100, ISO 100. Edited in LrC.
r/postprocessing • u/Quiet_Composer_17 • 23h ago
Sony a6100, E PZ 16-50 F3.5-5.6 OSS
Capture one + Adobe Photoshop
Uttrakhand, India
r/postprocessing • u/Appropriate_Reality6 • 11h ago
This picture went through a few different processes of editing. Originally being very dark I wanted to brighten it up but make it feel vintage/older, hints the grainy dark shadow look. Wanted other people’s opinion on it.
r/postprocessing • u/vaporwavecookiedough • 14h ago
Before -> After
My goal for this edit was to achieve a warm aesthetic that felt like walking through a dream.
Overall, I'm pleased with where this edit landed, though I think the bottom left part of the dress is a little hot.
r/postprocessing • u/Difficult_Doubt7301 • 1d ago
r/postprocessing • u/Zach0ry • 1d ago
r/postprocessing • u/EmilyPoster2 • 18h ago
r/postprocessing • u/HarFilend • 1d ago
quality is, unfortunately, a steaming deuce since it was taken handheld on a 20 year old dslr with a shitty lens, but that's the best I could get. what look, in your opinion, should I aim for in this case and is it even worth trying to salvage?